Re: [proaudio] [1939] oop

[Xavier Miller <xavier.miller@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

I removed it by mistake. I put it back after.

Xavier.

Le 27/04/11 18:50, Dominique Michel a écrit :
> Le Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:47:46 +0200,
> subversion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
>
> > Revision: 1939
> > Author:   alchemist
> > Date:     2011-04-27 17:47:46 +0200 (Wed, 27 Apr 2011)
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > oop
> >
> > Removed Paths:
> > -------------
> >      trunk/overlays/proaudio/sys-kernel/rt-sources/rt-sources-2.6.33.9-r31.ebuild
>
> I don't understand why you removed this ebuild. It is for the last
> rt-patch available here:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/
>
> If it doesn't work for you, fix it or send a bug message, but don't
> remove it. If it is no good raison to remove it, please reverse this
> commit.
>
> Ciao,
> Dominique
>
> P.S.: According to this thread on the LAD:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-audio-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg11801.html
> linus merged the force threaded irq handlers. This means, that
> the most important feature of the -rt patches is now in mainline.
>
> Now, we have the 2.6.39-rc5 version at kernel.org. I don't know how it
> work, but I think that in order to get the most of such a kernel, one
> would have to add "threadirqs" to the kernel boot params and to follow
> http://jackaudio.org/linux_group_sched
> I also think that on the long run, RT_GROUP_SCHED will replace
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT. And libcgroup is now in portage.
>
> I am also curious to see if such mainline improvements will be
> affected by the compilation failure metabug (like the rt-patch can be
> affected): http://bugs.gentoo.org/20600