| Re: [proaudio] [1719] add media-sound/jacker with some patches for Gentoo |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] [1719] add media-sound/jacker with some patches for Gentoo
- From: Gavin Pryke <gavinlee303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:17:31 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=oCRNdlc7eCeGD5bEfem6pq40kmZLn0u9iOqO1o5i47g=; b=Co9ZgrQJp6l4GZJOXpAMHPBKvJcShE/NPre+oz8aI+ozgyNbg3pvhUuRLHyh9hA0Fk cE3Y+kZ3w4smpjvToU5J1r1Jo9sb907L8anM4ypktEGfiEj2oEHsWlpPGx2yZkqeE9sA aTVrOkmzyUz3WeEgQnU2zxXVhnihRR8l2yHYk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=qFrdnxuAC/3H9hgJfXyH056XusfUiDCBQijRme9xbSxqwJ3SipOp4FxXB+iO7BNz4D 4M0d89jHPc4eOj1nQgG7rSix0hWOlpvjApnRA3jXDXvSPvPI8oXxHtG5Oz1xqzYbPFmy /MECR1+cukpTd4+RicGHIzBgextA3cmuH29hk=
On Monday 09 Aug 2010 13:17:00 subversion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Revision: 1719
> Author: gavlee
> Date: 2010-08-09 14:16:59 +0200 (Mon, 09 Aug 2010)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> add media-sound/jacker with some patches for Gentoo
>
----8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<----
Property changes on: trunk/overlays/proaudio/media-
sound/jacker/files/jacker.desktop
___________________________________________________________________
Added: svn:executable
+ *
----8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<----
Hi
Can someone please tell me why svn made the jacker.desktop file executable and
how I could go about undoing it? I notice no other *.desktop files in any
other $FILESDIR in the proaudio overlay. There are in portage but they are not
executable and that is how I think they should be. It's a tad annoying that
the file was chmod +x behind my back anyway.
Sorry for the hassles.
Cheers
Gav