[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [proaudio] Ardour behind
- From: Alex Montgomery <apmontgomery@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:11:06 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JvQZFtwxaUb3JxI0ABmlOm4R3hahbg/5eXo903BhIuE=; b=ZjBzgDr01RExv0wCUBjcXiivcvfj7dF/UyZoJzUOD269wU2lNUPyBXB1wSMMaZaDrh JlHJmJpsjuJBTybFziV6SHUpxYdJtMVI77utvJha+Els9cF8mxJQ7orjIdMZyMnctqCn SswwALG2Xj4miOg4qbe4Dsh522eg85lbV+Q1Y=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=njLJEzU2Qu/ZcdFOBlJ6PngBLW80zCBVI0GIG/HWtITYRDqP6fDSySfaIHf255aK5O POCww5K974W7alHI9155aMSo3RwPVHMlrnNBpg4oFxnk68bt8+HZQ4mQlTio0a0/xWav p7lBScMC8PpCqqW4iwuKmIArjDbC0fGSPHvmA=
Hello,
I was wondering why the non-svn ebuilds (i.e. not 2.999 or 3.9999) are
at version 2.7.1 even though there have been several official releases
since then. Does everyone use the live ebuilds? I tried using the
2.999 ebuild for awhile, but the code in svn can be flaky and crashes
often. I had to revert to the 2.7.1 ebuild, which is much more
crash-resistant, but has several known issues that have been fixed in
later versions. Particularly, users of midi surfaces can end up
destroying data with versions prior to 2.8.5:
http://ardour.org/node/3292
Is it hard to update the ebuild to 2.8.7, or is there another good
reason to stay at 2.7.1? I'd happily help with the update.
Thanks,
-- Alex