If it works, I don't care how it's spelled. I think the "working" part
is the deal-sealer. ;-)
wayne wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 00:55 +0300, Alexandros Diamantidis wrote:
* Gavin Pryke [2009-09-15 19:34]:
> On Tuesday 15 September 2009 17:49:01 Ulrich Lorenz Schlüter wrote:
> > Can we please have a nondaw ebuild?
>
> I've made an ebuild for this based on nonsequencer-9999.
Thanks for this, but wouldn't it be a bit more consistent to name the
ebuilds "non-daw" and "non-sequencer"? Seeing that the projects' web
sites, mailing list archives and executables all have them with a
hyphen, I would expect the ebuilds to be spelled with a hyphen as well.
Alexandros
+1
|