Re: [proaudio] [1418] museseq 1.0-rc1 (still needs --as-needed fix for

Re: [proaudio] [1418] museseq 1.0-rc1 (still needs --as-needed fix for driver/libjack*)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]

To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [proaudio] [1418] museseq 1.0-rc1 (still needs --as-needed fix for driver/libjack*)
From: Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:14:32 +0100

On Fr, 06.02.09 00:06 subversion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Revision: 1418
> Author:   gimpel
> Date:     2009-02-06 00:06:14 +0100 (Fri, 06 Feb 2009)
> 
> Log Message:
> -----------
> museseq 1.0-rc1 (still needs --as-needed fix for driver/libjack*)
> 

PS: I moved around the live ebuilds.

muse 1.0 CVS: museseq-1.9999 (was -0.9.9999)
muse 2.0 SVN: museseq-2.9999 (was -9999)

Should be more clear this way.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [proaudio] [1418] museseq 1.0-rc1 (still needs --as-needed fix for driver/libjack*)
  - From: subversion

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [proaudio] [1418] museseq 1.0-rc1 (still needs --as-needed fix for driver/libjack*)
Next by Date: [proaudio] is ardour really going??
Previous by thread: [proaudio] [1418] museseq 1.0-rc1 (still needs --as-needed fix for driver/libjack*)
Next by thread: [proaudio] is ardour really going??

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/