Re: [proaudio] kernel speed

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]


yeah, i think this is totally pointless.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mo, 08.12.08 14:00 Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> I done the speed/performance test from this forum thread :
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-401693-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-0.html
>
> My results for 2 different kernels are here :
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-401693-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-25.html#5303444
>
> What is very interesting is that 64studio kernel do performs better
> for one of the test that my own kernel on gentoo.
>
> I begun to investigate this. If someone is interested, I join 4 files:
>
> config-2.6.21-1-multimedia-amd64 is 64studio config
> config-2.6.26.6-rt11-3d is my gentoo config (-3D stand for the nvidia
> driver) diff-config-2.6.21-1-multimedia-amd64 contain what in
> 64studio config that is not into my config
> diff-config-2.6.26.6-rt11-3d contain what in my config that is not
> into 64studio config
>
> The diff are simplified, I removed most of the drivers part of the
> config.
>
> Ciao,
> Dominique

Just repeat that test a dozen of times. I got _totally_ different
results on each run. So I consider this "speed test" to be total
nonsense.




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/