Re: [proaudio] Guidance request for getting Ardour built on Gentoo 64-bit |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Guidance request for getting Ardour built on Gentoo 64-bit
- From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:55:44 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=4aAdyGZT5WHDJUzmTTLt4T74Q/5iM6Eneg5ufvk9eSU=; b=ROd6NfqfnYVwuPQKZa0+Ot9mSs/AVJ1Z80qKJGp2tQPZpSl2kHpKY4TsTUShAcdfcl epPAVJJmt4FMh/NhQ9kVpl4vh/SNCP0PDVnC9cZ9trqvDwprpbIKjgYJtXxvrzxzrR0c CF/dTp98Urc0CwvQRgkSSry5wJsGKptyKV8lY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=hccdymNJlnVE+W/dAZ3c8052ojb6zwotQtmlRgQVv9rtzB+Lf00Z4ic2+rQgQdR6EY 1is1NGS/DdOb9hZlAmQKBLgIsf53pFiygWUxCTUy4MQBpPglVfDINGyFq4+HyYVUxZwo Hv4fA+ihnscYRD/qkLD8ZbVk2hMU89ZksEJig=
I tried resyncing yesterday and then did emerge -DuN world, a depclean
and revdep-rebuild. Everything was clean but it still failed. I don't
(from memory) remember 2.1.6 as in the list so maybe my rsync server
is a little behind. I'll look again today.
These sorts of problems have a way of working themselves out over a
couple of days. Portage is just that way sometimes.
Thanks, and glad you're able to build. That's a good sign.
cheers,
Mark
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Arve Barsnes <arve.barsnes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Unless it's a problem with eselect itself, you could try resyncing. My
> portage got downgraded from 2.2rc to 2.1.6 now, and ardour is in the
> middle of compiling. I'm running a complete ~amd64 system though.
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Has anyone managed to get Ardour-2.7 built from portage?
>>
>> This morning I ran into some message that Ardour-2.7 was masked by
>> something called EAPI 2 and that I had to emerge a newer version of
>> portage. I set out to do that but am having some problems with portage
>> and eselect. I added ~amd64 to package.keywords for the 3 packages
>> shown but now the builds don't seem to work.
>>
>> Thanks in advance to anyone who knows how to fix this.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>>
>> lightning ~ # emerge -pvDuN portage
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> [ebuild U ] app-admin/eselect-1.0.11-r1 [1.0.10]
>> USE="-bash-completion -doc -vim-syntax" 150 kB
>> [ebuild N ] app-admin/eselect-news-20080320 6 kB
>> [ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc15 [2.1.4.5] USE="-build -doc
>> -epydoc (-selinux)" LINGUAS="-pl" 670 kB
>>
>> Total: 3 packages (2 upgrades, 1 new), Size of downloads: 825 kB
>> lightning ~ # emerge portage
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>>>>> Verifying ebuild Manifests...
>>>>> starting parallel fetching pid 26717
>>
>>>>> Emerging (1 of 3) app-admin/eselect-1.0.11-r1 to /
>>>>> Downloading 'http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/eselect-1.0.11.tar.bz2'
>> --2008-11-23 11:53:38--
>> http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/eselect-1.0.11.tar.bz2
>> Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org... 216.165.129.135, 140.211.166.134,
>> 156.56.247.195, ...
>> Connecting to distfiles.gentoo.org|216.165.129.135|:80... connected.
>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
>> Length: 153348 (150K) [application/x-tar]
>> Saving to: `/usr/portage/distfiles/eselect-1.0.11.tar.bz2'
>>
>> 100%[======================================>] 153,348 177K/s in 0.8s
>>
>> 2008-11-23 11:53:40 (177 KB/s) -
>> `/usr/portage/distfiles/eselect-1.0.11.tar.bz2' saved [153348/153348]
>>
>> * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
>> * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
>> * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
>> * checking eselect-1.0.11.tar.bz2 ;-) ... [ ok ]
>> * The ebuild phase 'setup' has exited unexpectedly. This type of behavior
>> * is known to be triggered by things such as failed variable assignments
>> * (bug #190128) or bad substitution errors (bug #200313).
>>
>> * Messages for package app-admin/eselect-1.0.11-r1:
>>
>> * The ebuild phase 'setup' has exited unexpectedly. This type of behavior
>> * is known to be triggered by things such as failed variable assignments
>> * (bug #190128) or bad substitution errors (bug #200313).
>> lightning ~ #
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>