Re: [proaudio] Which Ardour for Ardour2?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]


Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 15:44:14 schrieb Thomas Kuther:
> On Do, 07.02.08 06:32 "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm sorry, but which Ardour is the latest version?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > lightning ~ # eix ardour
> > * media-sound/ardour
> >      Available versions:  (~)0.99.2!m (~)0.99.3!m (~)2.0.3 (~)2.0.5
> > (~)2.0.5[1] (**)2.0.99992[1] [M](~)2.1 [M](~)2.1[1] (**)2.1.9999[1]
> > (~)2.2 (~)2.2[1] (**)99992[1] {altivec debug fftw nls sse sys-libs
> > vst}
> >      Homepage:            http://ardour.org/
> >      Description:         multi-track hard disk recording software
> >
> > [1] "proaudio" /usr/portage/local/layman/pro-audio
> > lightning ~ #
>
> 2.2 <- latest release
> 2.0.99992 / 2.1.9999 <- SVN 2.0 ongoing (they are identical)
> 99992 <- SVN trunk
>
> Regards,
> Tom
>
> PS: maybe we should rename 2.0.99992/2.1.9999 to 2.9999 to avoid some
> unmasking issues? e.g. 2.2 is "newer" than 2.1.9999

why not name it 2.2.9999 or in a few days then 2.3.9999.
2.3 is short before official release.


regards, harald




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/