| Re: [proaudio] why is ardour 2.1 hardmasked on amd64? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 23:43:04 schrieb Thomas Kuther:
>
> It's not hardmasked for amd64, it is hardmasked in general.
> See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194437
> The arguments for masking are a bit stupid though.. ardour wouldn't let
> you import flac, even if the internal sndfile _could_ be compiled with
> flac, etc.
this reason is not really a reason to hardmask it.
even if i can't import flac, i'd like to use it. but it's okay, and thanks for
the information.
> Simply unmask it, it works fine here. And with the ebuild in
> the overlay you have the choice if syslibs or not.
i'll unmask it, and hope that 2.2 will be released soon and only masked in the
tree.
the current ongoing svn version is really fine!
if someone is interested here are some new features/points:
rubberband is included. also the default time-strech can be done now with that
libray. (you need the vamp sdk to build ardour successful with the new
library.)
http://www.breakfastquay.com/rubberband/
new meters have been added beneath the audio tracks
a new editing style has been created, and seems to me as really useful. have a
look at http://ardour.org/node/1400 for details.
> Regards,
> Tom