Re: [proaudio] jost on amd64 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] jost on amd64
- From: "kRAkEn/gORe" <kunitoki@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:54:58 +0200
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MjoTusBhRXh2Qg3EiamnyAxHKPjwtVabCiWy8sf04A83NVmDuHZvI9IAyjXCA4ufLKgk9Nwwl4ACdxlWjGNcCNu2vV5prJ7MwDd00bBMv+CobNV4BMXwTZPwmlTUws0Ucmgq4OweR5MuepFdUOzyT6GrrZmt4OavlOnLgRpL6i8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eeIBabSH6txJm+xUvTCSjIiLa39Gto99nHmntOcTrl3Om4Jc67GO62njdbsbJQ8giOrWStInRsnSlverVdNvmirOOKCLWEUadM3gXWsf0Vv27kU+gIowQFnE0uWBhnt5nDVK6qpFN1pbDXJ0OFb0+tc/Um0DAmA6INJFGX3ighg=
ok the problem is JUCE related. it's late now, but tomorrow i'll try
to figure out why isn't working on 64bit (we spent a lot of posts
trying to get the better asm support for that)...
On 6/18/07, Andrew Gaydenko <a@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
======= On Monday 18 June 2007, kRAkEn/gORe wrote: =======
> what kind of problems you getting ? compiling problems ? running
> problems of the binary provided in my site ? can you be more precise ?
> this way we can help you in making jost for you too !
Emerging ends with:
......................
juce_linux_Messaging.cpp
juce_linux_Windowing.cpp
juce_linux_SystemStats.cpp
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:13: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
{standard input}:13: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'
make[1]: *** [../../../bin/intermediate/JuceRelease/juce_linux_SystemStats.o] Error 1
make: *** [JUCE] Error 2
!!! ERROR: media-sound/jost-0.3.3 failed.
......................
~amd64 arch is in use, gcc version is 'gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2)'.
>
> On 6/17/07, Andrew Gaydenko <a@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Are there successful stories?
> >
> >
>