| Re: [proaudio] Ardour-2.0.2 amd64 keyword |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Ardour-2.0.2 amd64 keyword
- From: Richard Connon <richard.connon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:37:01 +0100
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=l51DzQ/i14WbBqMhf98nKqeEbWcwD7WP2mYvCZtReB7Ms+DOSeOo4XLFbJuPw2oyq+GojMID4uWM8cq5poij2im6ywuaBiSbdQ48v+/6Lp+50r7fVO5Rz+JEUUCeIQSPXgSyCtr+lNDccPPKva0fr/furJp/QJAQMENSxKSU3gk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IPjnJeZ2usLvFWWeTOUpjSsauW/TYvwIqfcT6K3mw9uwWCie/bnjcslFGvBkJa+kn6h8qX2x4lCWpLE3R4usyUsNsB7UiPLZ0/eI/YTfNGBH/rdY+2+UVoepjWdo8Qec8GWNQYDdfvQ0pE59PtNoihuw5/c6u9KbYTQ7dMjvZPs=
I haven't had any problems with it.
If there is need for someone with an amd64 box to help out with the
overlay I could probably spare the time.
Thomas Kuther wrote:
> On Mo, 21.05.07 16:41 Richard Connon <richard.connon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> The ardour-2.0.x ebuilds should surely be amd64 keyworded.
>> Is there a reason they are not?
>>
>
> Because none of us has an amd64 box it seems.
> Does it compile and work?
>