| Re: [proaudio] rtirq borked |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] rtirq borked
- From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:34:10 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oRYZqVSBzyYFPFjPtOyLwoa+ELbyJTUjiM2QgM7rCVj6zcLfGTPcusA37FlEdmt9SdUp33ytgbVKLWkBzgzt8JJ8NeqgcWsZ3STEUNQOK6AZHih4Tuhagk7YMb5sALeIW53Ub/CxRViueBVJ/GiBmdSXntQFHp3iwTqABfdeJ08=
On 9/14/06, karsten <k.gebbert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
that would give:
rambazamba ~ # cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
Dual CPU system?????
<SNIP>
16: 42 0 IO-APIC [........./ 0]-level
yenta, uhci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5, hdsp
With MANY things shared on IRQ16!
Yenta is a cardbus bridge?
2 additional USB controllers
And the HDSP...
Is it possible to move the HDSP to another slot so that it doesn't
share interrupts? In my experience that usually works a bit better as
it is simpler. That said I'm violating my own advice in my machine and
I'm doing OK, at least until this gcc upgrade.
- Mark