Re: [proaudio] fbsplash for -rt

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]


On 5/18/06, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2006 11:11:37 -0700
"Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 5/18/06, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 May 2006 10:43:00 -0700
> > "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On 5/18/06, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 18:21:44 +0000
> > > > krgn <k.gebbert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > is it going to be part of the ebuild at some stage?
> > > > >
> > > > > KArsten
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Frieder, you want to include it? (don't want to mess around in
> > > > your ebuild ;))
> > > >
> > > > Uploaded it to our tuxfamily webspace:
> > > > SRC_URI:
> > > > http://proaudio.tuxfamily.org/patches/fbsplash-0.9.2-r5-2.6.16-rt.patch
> > >
> > > If you choose to include it please add a USE flag to control its
> > > addition. I do not want to add it to my kernels. If Ingo doesn't
> > > add it then I want to build without it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mark
> > >
> >
> > lol, fbsplash has nothing to do with -rt. You do not have to enable
> > it in your kernel config if you do not want it. It's configurable.
> > gentoo-sources also has no useflag for it, so why should rt-sources?
> >
> > Tom
>
> OK - do what you want. Sorry to make a request
>

No it's OK! Sorry if that sounded too harsh, i didn't mean it so hard.
It's just like, to be consequent, that evermind would also have to make
vesafb-tng and realtime-lsm a useflag, because those two also are not
included into Ingo's -rt patch - because both also have absolutely
nothing to do at all with the -rt patch. :)

Cheers,
Tom

OK, sorry if I took it wrong. My apologies for that.

Thanks,
Mark



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/