| Re: [pok-devel] Proposing a patch to sched.c |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/pok-devel Archives
]
- To: pok-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [pok-devel] Proposing a patch to sched.c
- From: Julien Delange <julien@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:07:34 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NvRPOGSdfodGy8hw07vnmUBTOlyueZEvj71jm62AQdw=; b=jSLGEnoORPMWvsEvySoVHp8gsJl/ZUOPV8b0fG2x2CLHM9cm4+apWBWkK67D6GKuiN NddIXz6nTG3o/fRTP14YXmbxwJ/LOXaPkrydttaSuuKMFoM410/Jt4OUEfZbU119aHVU g5rGVDbDS+Xfg0rljjuvTttB7NgB1F/YULGBEVO4IdXJrjaXb9vZz508fXtlwLIHn0EF e+rcYK6eZ4EIHMizWCbDJCLGcMgLjgvDtmUM9P2N8rnDrGqltDcgleeHxKe1SXDTP2fu 2HX2W/5I1YtOBdrZFawukx7i8z0mAt2VGZQPjZVq2xFB3UjB3BTMRGB9rGo58k7TgvnU OuRA==
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Etienne Borde
<etienne.borde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But the question would raise for any contribution to POK that is not
> directly implemented in Ocarina... For this part it is up to you guys to
> define the rules.
I think you can just add the generated code in the examples directory
(solution 2), as it is already done for some examples. That would not
test the code generator but this is sufficient to test pok functions
and does not require much effort on your side.
Does that sounds reasonable for you ?