| Re: [pok-devel] DELAYED_START implementation |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/pok-devel Archives
]
- To: pok-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [pok-devel] DELAYED_START implementation
- From: Julien Delange <julien@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:47:03 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dUPUMd8Uq5cfpcVixUk/7Peswzfd+BJuuPeMAj42KjQ=; b=YjraIAC2SLN4m53fN5/Rx3FYdOHPDu6oL3gIuit7Qk/lJiTReFOsk0icGUCvsMHGZj NUDfMtdcxZvHcYrXRbeYPhmndWY2zP8iHXBc3c/W76WV7JnfvsFQw8KRT/9doDAqqzSY EPbTgPWuo0lkcgcT7T794KhiATwchY8Sv3BFtzpD4Jh/7f9viwkRZnGSq8LujGqUbxAz Mkb6wlXoEf48vuK3ZruSyih/oepoW0EA9hq+ZAlmLeaWikLE2AmnRVZdtkVOStDSvADQ 0pGwKT3tdGesHWMYYTcoZ6Yqo5o9vGE1MYFFKKsBxiVuMVnjR5kWOwT+VZIS+1nxWAaW D4RA==
Sounds ok for me, go ahead :-)
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jeremy Rosen <jeremy.rosen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hello everybody
>
> I am now finishing the DELAYED_START implementation started by Matias.
>
> I have a working implementation (patch attached that I have been stress-testing for some time, and that seems to work. However I would be grateful if someone could do some independant proofreading/testing before I commit. This thing is a bit tricky especially around the scheduler timing calculations and I would be grateful if somebody could proofread that.
>
> In particular ARIC specify that wakeup calculations should be based on the partition's next scheduling. I have based that on partition.activation+POK_CONFIG_MAJOR_FRAME but I am not sure that partition.activation is correctly set when the partition has not been started and if I can rely on that to calculate the partition's next activation time...
>
> thx for the help
>
> Jérémy
>
>
> fight key loggers : write some perl using vim
>