Re: [non-daw] lv2

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:36 PM,  <male@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010, plutek-infinity wrote:
greetings, again!

i'm curious about the lack of lv2 support in non daw -- is this a decision *against* lv2, or simply a "not done yet" thing?



I have no interest in implementing support for LV2 at the
current time. There is simply nothing compelling about LV2
over LADSPA. I do, however, plan to support DSSI.

Feb 23 2010,
John Moore Liles


Is still dssi maintained ?
lv2 is really a nice standard, but it's currently under exploited. The lv2 design is quite interesting imho and it's philosophy isn't that far from the non-things one

Head of LabFree,  Free software laboratory of Epitech
Phone : 01 53 14 59 32 || 06 17 32 86 93.
Mail : <j.ballet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- <elthariel@xxxxxxxxx>
Web :

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+