Re: Package list.

[Vincent Kergonna <vincent.k@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yep, but we can ask slamd64 maintainer about that ;)

jp wrote:

> Be carefull : some slamd64 packages maybe voluntary old due to 
> versions incompatibility :)
>
> Vincent Kergonna wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As some of you know we are beginning to work on a x86_64 version of 
> > minislack. I have started comparing the version each package between 
> > slamd64 and minislack.
> > What I saw for now is that minislack is more up-to-date than slamd64.
> > I think that we will need to keep an up-to-date list of packages that 
> > comes with minislack (both versions...) and their versions.
> > Why ? To stay synchronized between minislack 32bits and minislack 
> > 64bits!
> > I my opinion this list should include both "default" packages and 
> > extra packages (speaking of the "extra" directory in the repository).
> >
> > What do you think ?