Re: Package list.

["Bruno R. da Silva" <blood@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, i don't have a 64 bit processor, so i can't help. But i think the 
both versions of mslack needs to be synchronized.

Vincent Kergonna wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> As some of you know we are beginning to work on a x86_64 version of 
> minislack. I have started comparing the version each package between 
> slamd64 and minislack.
> What I saw for now is that minislack is more up-to-date than slamd64.
> I think that we will need to keep an up-to-date list of packages that 
> comes with minislack (both versions...) and their versions.
> Why ? To stay synchronized between minislack 32bits and minislack 64bits!
> I my opinion this list should include both "default" packages and 
> extra packages (speaking of the "extra" directory in the repository).
>
> What do you think ?