| Re: [hatari-users] Pixel tripling / quadrupling |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-users Archives
]
- To: hatari-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-users] Pixel tripling / quadrupling
- From: Gareth Morris <preromanbritain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:57:54 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20230601; t=1738155485; x=1738760285; darn=lists.tuxfamily.org; h=to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version:from :content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=4V5ffTjKCBRv0knk2dIM/8Q9Tol2d2ZFJb3J8skCPpc=; b=LjBdOPcLNIswUFflH5e2qLqpV54XtrW3lFf11Te8M4X/1JbSsI80GxVA0C3QVNYRu5 k+o3FSvCKONScOFkHLu38MzpAshLXZU1zjAn1pmInC9kIVJp9tSd99RiLczb7v4tr+dY hQ9/wlYZqwO8DkrRgDoFac6V5UYUrfC5cAaGdvd5sTQImYveY+ReVJuuNq5eK/uA2wkt O+4SGOYrvDL9DuD59Ibi8AqrdtJuImGPNEZRfyfcFrFTLWV2zbd/CtDFq9wlU73WvBVH F2RBfwd7+YVMrrSds/Rx78IutnCNfVPry8/gN+lZKUXiTGoibjmXX1z2lejxt3tJWjQg Yt2g==
Thank you for the reply Nicolas.
Yes I tried with the command line last night, this exact command, and it was definitely using some kind of smoothing and the result was blurry.
I am using MacOS. I asked a two other users about this and they confirmed my findings.
Gareth
> On 29 Jan 2025, at 13:37, Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Le 29/01/2025 à 13:28, Gareth Morris a écrit :
>> Hello Hatari,
>> I am using the latest build of Hatari on my Apple. I tried the zoom command line option to try to get a sharp picture with pixel tripling or even quadrupling like the old Steem used to do (my eyes are not what they were).
>> Unfortunately anything above the default pixel doubling comes out blurry, even when setting higher max-height and max-width
>> Any idea what I might be doing wrong, or if 3x / 4x is even possible?
>> Thank you for your time,
>> Gareth / gwEm
>
> Hi gwEn !
>
> there's no such option in Hatari's UI, but if you run it from command line (windows or macOS ?) you can use the "--zoom" option to get the expected result.
>
> for example, run
>
> hatari --zoom 3
>
> From what I see (also with aging eyes :) ) the result is not blurry.
>
> Nicolas