| [hatari-devel] Recent screen.c / SDL related changes |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: Hatari Development <hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [hatari-devel] Recent screen.c / SDL related changes
- From: Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 21:42:06 +0300
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.dnamail.fi 796242113E01
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helsinkinet.fi; s=2025-03; t=1760985726; bh=Tg37TC2/5vjAzBnHWISUVfpi4JOF9yTOgacT0xFNt7k=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:From; b=Mp+KzO08IuBn5F/t6ziD6E+cipYoWNDy1i2urwFPIpDClm6fqC81Dr89YuNpBRrpS cXrIpsyqpzzytiNqNFq/dOK5V5QgB76DygvpFf3qriJI5tYF2YnhvmIxcfr3AWlh7o +5GA6VsV9Zv4g3hUMtI3e4ziawZoyG3qogjGcwCW6+d3f5ddLVvNQ4rsYqW1CASy1Y akuC2gq8b2iW+Hi43BxbBUEbPfA8S0Oq6cjSIjMtoLfH3SXgSuViGpJpC79c1Ce6ys 1kjQBV4GXp+T/93j3Ka733pKMt9tlAsU4yy5JMVbgk23fTWOGvShYh9RJVK7Hr/WlP SF/kDy1MZNtHA==
Hi Thomas,
While the changes to isolate SDL usage in screen.c code are otherwise
fine, I really do not like the name of the new scrConvSt.c file &
"ScrConvSt_" function prefix.
Maybe it could be screenST.c with functions have "ScreenST_" prefix
instead? I think that would differentiate them enough from remaining
screen.c functions that need SDL and still use "Screen_" prefix?
- Eero