Re: [hatari-devel] Regression in Hatari 2.6.1 - Disabling GEMDOS drive fails |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Regression in Hatari 2.6.1 - Disabling GEMDOS drive fails
- From: Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 12:27:16 +0300
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.dnamail.fi 7E3604098E80
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helsinkinet.fi; s=2025-03; t=1757496436; bh=6tkPUiPFaMJZ1GlKKraeQMjYeZgsdRRFckjTJXXu4/g=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YHHXSQ87dFV9Ye0zJC7uVmJBg0NomoVc1AU4bDLmK7kuTrCgsNfb70Gyr4rBGXkXo qb1c/BJErURvsaeHInY5ek1xAMPpKmkMQdWwsNi8raC3KlknuJjqMwnn4FBS0WOHpo 3d7vkyQdW8eH0WbEnLEBimK01DWv4Mr3cSI1BqRhPvVjEyZlereAn3rAFA2OtyE2l5 Gkx/0ENdIwWWJ/Q8ho/wVjQzyNYsLdD9WXh/kwnwmLyXPkrtgGGCw/CaQW5MkWHywI j5bv1I40e2x84TNaac9fU6NbACcf0C7le984LZwtZqGUw7CUYXPyJHglR7jScAMfZF U1gItY4L+H7CA==
Hi,
On 8.9.2025 20.39, Eero Tamminen wrote:
Didn't receive any of the replies visible in archive, but everybody
seems in favor of "" instead of "none" for disabling GEMDOS HD...
=> should the file arguments also be changed to accept "" value for
disabling related options, e.g. in addition to "none"?
Pushed change where both values are accepted, and in case of "none", the
code will now check first that there's no (accessible) file/dir with
such name.
- Eero