| Re: [hatari-devel] _FRB cookie in Falcon emulation |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] _FRB cookie in Falcon emulation
- From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 10:36:34 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1754130994; bh=+wNXI2mHv9QkItOheCO9TFwc48chAbHstUQSfCp5PPs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=MURBQRX4QOFd5owAu98XQTFVzuzLud8V1ck15anFZWEqg6wsguSwkYBM13EGHLHvG J+ZS9DH4K7kd7uCYpE83fS8VpmheBdDh9C+K//mVlO6qxSqLvX8OiQ6VOsNVRqwSnS 0z6KO0o1CPfoCzeLzIDBfp3ctqU/HvPZZjylFUo+zWpBOho5DnXsmri4l/4l0wnEHV bWRGdDloW27fj5Ns9yP+7MOi5//5SNkjstmH+DvIdaGJtvnSCrbeFtjNab+udEX9Z4 i1w4mXYWg1jhUxSU2Zu6b9lewIWky9tBSjzScqY93HH8BLQjaXf5C1c3YowIb0Oq3E dRlE1lfaqADXQ==
Am Fri, 1 Aug 2025 22:21:52 +0200
schrieb Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Too bad I did not know this some days ago. It would have saved my beta
> testers and me quite some time, but anyway ...
>
> As already mentioned there is accelerator hardware which does not require a
> patched TOS but sets up Alternate-RAM with a program for the AUTO folder. I
> doubt that one of my beta testers is the only user who uses the accelerator
> this way.
> Saying that, I still understand the motivation for these changes, but the
> assumption that there is always a patched TOS when there is a Falcon
> accelerator board is not correct.
I've got the feeling that we're not getting our messages accross...
If Hatari does not modify the sytem variables, and does not set the _FRB
cookie, how should it support fast RAM in Falcon mode in your opinion? We
would need to ship a AUTO folder program in that case, is that what you'd
like to see? IMHO that's the worse option for most Hatari users, since it
does not work out of the box...
Thomas