Re: [hatari-devel] Doing Hatari 2.6.1 release |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Doing Hatari 2.6.1 release
- From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 19:50:55 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1753645855; bh=zNM7dvWi8hYbkn572LiSQJQ1+H1Qg00RtbvChtiuiwo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=JUoXZDZigUxaquA15WTXph0AMI5pn2uw8IoVFwvIw2d9Y0BQtkvM2Csza+o7MMX7t Ws+aH65G0ojPyz+Qr598Lj9X/vF4SV+n15x5cLhrR5SfQLA4UMrbjfzucMRVU4iWpv azMO7E1DIR9dJzME+w4Cvf2aJm7023ClFI9g6J9eNZggPEE96Wx6MM5PGRyv6C92fU F0j3uSwINklkjrda5IdDVK/ZTSEbSky+2xc0ZmCCA8khvcyOL/u+2WWGcFuJT/dEvH Zp64PWovXaXTUaPjXS0wSaCxsuArloDjOSzrExoXHZW61Sie0LZ8C6hPhC/ux1kayf q05dvEicxFk4g==
Am Sun, 27 Jul 2025 21:25:57 +0200
schrieb Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Le 27/07/2025 à 20:21, Thomas Huth a écrit :
> > Am Sat, 26 Jul 2025 23:03:16 +0200
> > schrieb Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >> Le 08/07/2025 à 19:01, Nicolas Pomarède a écrit :
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> seeing the few reports we got since releasing 2.6.0 and the fixes that
> >>> were already done or are incoming, I think it could be possible do a
> >>> 2.6.1 release soon, maybe before end of july.
> >>>
> >>> So, let's not push big changes for the moment to the git repo, small new
> >>> changes are possible, in order to limit possible new regression when we
> >>> do 2.6.1
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I should be able to do 2.6.1 in 1 or 2 days, so let me know if you have
> >> a pending issue (not one already listed here since 2.6.0 was released,
> >> as this was either already fixed or will be done after 2.6.1 to avoid
> >> further regressions)
> >
> > Shall I still commit the fix for the floppy problem with TT-RAM in Falcon
> > mode? It theoretically should be safe since it should only trigger when
> > running in Falcon mode with TT-RAM enabled, but it's changing the
> > cartridge, so there might be a small risk for other regressions... ?
>
> Hi
>
> looking at the change, it's rather small and I don't see problem at
> first glance.
>
> Also Miro reported it worked, so I think it can be committed and go
> into 2.6.1.
Ok, all right, so I went ahead and pushed it.
Thanks,
Thomas