Re: [hatari-devel] DKIM/DMARC test

[Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 29/06/2025 à 15:19, Thomas Huth a écrit :

> > But yes, for people who don't have the possibility to filter on arbitrary
> > headers, this is indeed bad, so I re-enabled the prefix again 'til we've
> > got a final decision whether it's ok to remove the prefix or not.
>
> By the way, many other lists that I'm subscribed to got rid of the prefix
> for exactly the same reason, too, see e.g.:
>
>   https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-09/msg00416.html
>
> So unless there's someone on this list who really depends on the prefix for
> filtering (since they cannot use "List-ID"), I'd recommend that we disable
> the prefix for the Hatari mailing lists, too.

hi

on my side I would also vote to keep [hatari-devel] in the subject, even 
if my filter rules are based on the list name in the mail's header I 
find it more convenient to also have the prefix when reading my mails 
from another device/client (I does my filtering client side on my pc but 
I sometimes does a quick check from my mobile phone and I don't feel 
like replicating all my filtering rules just for that)

As for fixing the problem in a DKIM/DMARC compliant way , it seems the 
mailing list should use the ARC system to do a chain of signatures, 
unfortunately it's quite unlikely that this will be done on tuxfamily's 
mailing list, given the state of tuxfamily as we know it :(

Nicolas