| Re: [hatari-devel] Framagit Hatari build artifacts |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Framagit Hatari build artifacts
- From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 06:05:31 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1743919533; bh=SyIi7zrfFd3CptPa6hl5PKDkz7Q6bY+n6YAiRSfNSmE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=B9N1/8vXcxaoSMhO+ytB5/smSnOEnlQSlN5C/EPQybTXuaRkrDkyjr7Isxcui7Hjr D5HV6B0Rj8QSkY4Pt+4zkMk36xYcNdv0yKZArJKDCm4oPs7kSfiILvP7JxPjYUbLM5 k1zW7iBG3sk17KqHdRZRATZmSdWDFrJyqYgFs/wYlt8pP50BfGmDaqQBm7U9Juk4XS pxXObxwdyFaQp0Lw4+w+Sqk2GEB2TxTEOkslurdLC213+2ynF6cLLleND3IT6Hd95Q GACLSly2cRsMk058eL3PZPUcGyhyeFPuTBNAzeVerAQEcNAegejxvg4PkqJGDKACaf rwkGGeBebpkew==
Am Sat, 5 Apr 2025 15:26:03 -0600
schrieb Charles Curley <charlescurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 20:09:17 +0000
> Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > Why Fedora build stores also src & bin RPMs, when Debian minimal &
> > > 32-bit builds provide only build log?
> >
> > That simply because someone once contributed a hatari.spec file for
> > creating RPMs, so we can build the RPMs in the CI, too, but nobody
> > ever contributed the build files for creating .deb files.
>
> There is a hatari package available for Debian (and likely for Debian
> derivatives). There should also be a source package. For the gory
> details:
>
> apt show hatari
Sure, but someone who is using Debian would need to pick up those files,
and contribute a corresponding patch for Hatari, and also figure out the
right runes for the .gitlab-ci.yml file. I personally currently don't use
Debian at the momement, so I won't do this.
Thomas