Re: [hatari-devel] Fsfirst issue with GEMDOS drive

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]


Yes, this appears to match my observation, see my sample code.

> Christian Zietz schrieb:
> 
> > with Hatari commit
> > 8e0e3880
> 
> I do see one potential problem with this commit, though. Eero, since
> you've authored it, can you please recheck?
> 
> If Fsfirst is called to get the volume label, you store the flag for the
> volume in the DTA of the process:
> 
> https://github.com/hatari/hatari/commit/8e0e38804fb222c92a485a588fc0f72b4d8e62ff#diff-08b4eb2eb5973bd9152ce1f180a224afaa85d914dc3a2000ce4d1cb67cabcc97R3063
> 
> However, if on a subsequent call to Fsfirst (this time for regular
> files) this flag is still in the DTA, the call will fail with ENMFIL (-49):
> 
> https://github.com/hatari/hatari/commit/8e0e38804fb222c92a485a588fc0f72b4d8e62ff#diff-08b4eb2eb5973bd9152ce1f180a224afaa85d914dc3a2000ce4d1cb67cabcc97R2921
> 
> Without the minimal example from Uwe, of course, we don't know if that's
> what he is observing.
> 
> Regards
> Christian
> --
> Christian Zietz  -  CHZ-Soft  -  czietz@xxxxxxx
> WWW: https://www.chzsoft.de/
> New GnuPG-Key-ID: 0x8708B34C827B159E
> 
> 
> 



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/