Re: [hatari-devel] Separate CPU video cycles under its own "cpu_video_cycles" trace flag?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]


Hi,

On 30.6.2023 23.27, Nicolas Pomarède wrote:
Le 30/06/2023 à 19:57, Eero Tamminen a écrit :
Any objections on the attached patch?
....
That info is still there when using either:
     --trace cpu_disasm,cpu_video_cycles
or:
     --trace cpu_all

this looks fine to me as a patch (although I'm a big user of the video cycles ;-) ), also it makes the code slightly smaller by factoring the trace code.

Thanks!  Pushed.


	- Eero




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/