Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]

To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices
From: Thorsten Otto <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 14:15:18 +0100

On Sonntag, 16. Januar 2022 13:33:57 CET Eero Tamminen wrote:

> I noticed that you already set SMALL_MEM as default for new builds.

Is that really a good idea? That will cause an additional indirection for all memory accesses, posssibly slowing down emulation. What devices are nowadays running hatari that don't even have 14MB of free memory?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices
  - From: Thomas Huth

References:
- [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices
  - From: Eero Tamminen
- Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices
  - From: Thomas Huth
- Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices
  - From: Eero Tamminen

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices
Next by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices
Previous by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices
Next by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari on constrained devices

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/