Finally got things to build, so they (might) be back up again now. Only x86_64 still, I don't think it's possible to generate arm64 targets without paying for a developer certificate (which I'm inclined to do though).
The way I modified things when creating the resulting binary does break existing code signatures though, however of the frameworks and dylibs I include only SDL2 has one so that's the "only" loss.
For information: My automated macOS builds are currently broken since I'm upgrading the build VM to be able to do Apple Silicon as well. This has the side effect of raising minimum macOS version from 10.6 (Snow Leopard) to 10.9 (Mavericks) as well (Xcode 12.3, previously I used 10.1).
regards,
Troed
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, January 1, 2021 7:12 PM, Troed Sångberg <troed@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, January 1, 2021 5:36 PM, Bob Carpenter <hatari@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Right now, I am more interested in whether Troed is able to generate a Universal binary for Hatari. When I complied it, I received a strange error when attempting to run it on my new M1 MacBook Air.
I haven't put any effort into it yet. According to Apple it's straight forward, so I might have a go at it, the problem being I don't have an M1 system myself.
regards,
Troed