Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler

Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler - long history

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]

To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler - long history
From: Douglas Little <doug694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:43:17 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=z120Wh52oCKPsNge7AcYMFs1RWuuHahiqI1nGdcnfxU=; b=Kc+jJdvw8tjff/4Qlv2AxtcU1l+y5C1tuKZiJ4xq1TLAUtK0FRW2DTINNSChWkkEbi y9F+LSqTvHWBUtgctcxusmPn8uo7f/ivz1DC1lmFSuKjlhAL1rmi5DWlNVvWsrrxFaJp DISInMnJLJrbSpya7kW3m84kjML2wqATtOarbqf74f7qAFUaQAeI0/fVQg7xyLtKVhIh I/puQDEsAOq8B56h2Is4OE8S/xwgCE8/T5h9plcgcD6Cio9uwqU9sSjFQT7BPn6NC3xu rskDKdJYhuRzUTa5Y/gPNfQUfrAbBkWQpIuxyYYH1LlInK3r5qQLmXEn01gymfJOnlLm +d7g==

Hi,

...

I could add something similar, but this would need to be improved anyway, because this code only counted instruction cache misses, but not data cache misses.

One thing I meant to ask about the new core - does it assume CPU cache burst modes are available? Or have those been locked off for Falcon? (since the signals are not implemented on the real machine). This could upset timings in some interesting ways...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler - long history
  - From: Nicolas Pomarède

References:
- [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler - long history
  - From: Eero Tamminen
- Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler - long history
  - From: Nicolas Pomarède

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler - long history
Next by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler - long history
Previous by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler - long history
Next by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] Re: Profiler - long history

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/