Re: [hatari-devel] FPU detection, who is wrong?

[Toni Wilen <twilen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Looking at the 68881 user's manual ...
>
> https://archive.org/stream/bitsavers_motorola68anual1ed1987_15689294/68881_68882_Users_Manual_1ed_1987#page/n244/mode/1up
>
> ... it seems like both are wrong - 68881 can report 0x1f and 0x3f, and
> 68882 reports 0x1f. Newer versions of the FPUs could report even other
> version numbers. To distinguish both, the length field should be used
> instead, I think.
>
> I've cc-ed Toni Wilen ... maybe he knows where the 0x20 comes from...?

I have no idea where those 2 values came from, they were there before I 
knew nothing about UAE and I assumed they were correct.

I just tested what my 68030 based Amiga 3000 with 68882 returns, version 
number = 0x1f. Unfortunately I don't have any 68881s.