| Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari/EmuTOS Conflict |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari/EmuTOS Conflict
- From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:25:48 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IMg7oEOMKJ4eTWKwALJEqUNi7OfTX9OnmOrmDFnmvH0=; b=HVZYw6RS4dNtnsTx6V44qi+jw85hv+fBOzovMYLsyjmMjAap2OpphlwvvYQQu6qvqo gs5Vt/4cGwO/QRAtQba4A6EMIC28vFUTJv8fSIvXcyMppqaTSB+ZlXCz9IchQuo8WV91 K2eDDksnwrq8yJERL6U8MnqfZJSOGITKmXtDWPIGxb5Ah+hqaSD0TT2RE7WfaRHqDitC GyNzAgP0VIh9LVDN9r/P7/onZhVpDv9w9rjVktJDn1v8DbCbCkpPd1l88F9E+6WLU55o o+cnpk5P+U0a5aAZJGls3kkMntsD/HWEPtzWM8jirB7VBTxoPOkOaTryQlzvDZvrHIN3 NLuw==
On 10/06/2013 15:34, Nicolas Pomarède wrote:
I disagree with the comment in the code : it is mandatory to wait for
0xf0/0xf1 after the IKBD reset in all cases, whether it's under an
emulator or under real HW.
I have just fixed the comment in EmuTOS sources.
I hope this is correct, now.
/* The IKBD answers to Reset command with a version byte.
* It is *mandatory* to wait for that byte before sending further commands,
* otherwise the IKBD will enter an undefined state. Concretely, it will
* stop working.
* This is particularly important on real hardware, and with Hatari which
* has very accurate IKBD emulation.
*/
--
Vincent Rivière