Doug.
On 3 February 2013 20:17, Laurent Sallafranque
<laurent.sallafranque@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Doug,
If you have 5 minutes, can you tell me what you think about this one ?
p:041e 6a7000 000001 (06 cyc) move r2,y:$0001
I would expect 4 cycles and not 6, do you agree (2 for the move and 2 for the immediate address mode) ?
Is it possible to have it under the benchmarker to verify it ?
There's no hurry, but I think I've detected a little problem (if it is the case, I think I've got the answer to fix it).
Regards
Laurent