Re: [eigen] Comma initializing a very big matrix

[Rasmus Munk Larsen <rmlarsen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you for the initializer list suggestion, Christoph. Nice to hear from you.

Rasmus

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 6:51 AM Christoph Hertzberg <chtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2024-04-05 01:01, Ian Bell wrote:
> Is there a way to (in order of niceness):
> 1. Get the comma init to work

Using the comma-initializer results in a call-graph like:

     operator,(operator,(...,
         operator,(operator<<(MatrixXd,double),
         ...), double), double)

With a 45*45 call-depth this may stress your compiler more than it is
capable. I would use the comma-initializer only if you need C++03
compatibility or to compose larger matrices from (a few!) sub-matrices.

> 2. Do a less-annoying workaround

I suggest using much more readable initializer lists:

     const Eigen::MatrixXd kernel_1{
         {0.0, 0.01, 0.02, ..., 0.44},
         {1.0, 1.01 ,1.02, ..., 1.44},
         ...
     };


> 3. At least crash with some sort of useful message

I guess that is a compiler issue. We can't do much from Eigen's side.

Christoph


--
  Dr.-Ing. Christoph Hertzberg

  DFKI GmbH
  Robotics Innovation Center
  Robert-Hooke-Straße 1
  28359 Bremen, Germany

  Tel.:     +49 421 178 45-4021
  Zentrale: +49 421 178 45-0
  E-Mail:   christoph.hertzberg@xxxxxxx

  Weitere Informationen: http://www.dfki.de/robotik

   -------------------------------------------------------------
   Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH
   Trippstadter Straße 122, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany

   Geschäftsführung:
   Prof. Dr. Antonio Krüger (Vorsitzender)
   Helmut Ditzer

   Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
   Dr. Ferri Abolhassan
   Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
   -------------------------------------------------------------