Re: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

To: "eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation
From: "Wood, Tobias" <tobias.wood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:26:43 +0000
Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tobias.wood@xxxxxxxxx;
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kcl.ac.uk; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=i+SVon53tLeW+Qx1UjHyWXwK0XJ3YNOHN7dAtojYpak=; b=o4K9xZijjPSy7dqchMMW0Cu9AAddOkQI5d4ye1p9gBNMsnFy2UjRAc6d+7sECVGFnod3T3UGCOCNnF00BD8PbSXBpI8BSWUVPwF0y/MOLlr45U62TUrGRXQxkoBT5ElfXoFsPYKrnEODgdfHV2Q4XZNVAdI0MhSPj++O1UVJXU8=
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Thread-index: AQHUrMh4LjE6moGqtEuN1EEZkMgyFaWwcSSAgAALnYCABJ1ZgA==
Thread-topic: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation

> If Toby doesn't want to or cannot find the time, I would try to implement it the next days.

My apologies, I missed these e-mails. If you have the time please feel free to implement this, you will likely do a better and faster job than I would.

I think constructors are the more natural solution than more static members.

Best wishes,

Toby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation
  - From: Christoph Hertzberg

References:
- [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation
  - From: Wood, Tobias
- Re: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation
  - From: Gael Guennebaud
- Re: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation
  - From: David Tellenbach

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [eigen] Documentation: Partial vs Full pivot in LU decomposition
Next by Date: Re: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation
Previous by thread: Re: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation
Next by thread: Re: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/