|Re: [eigen] Plans for 3.3.5 release?|
[ Thread Index |
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Plans for 3.3.5 release?
- From: Patrik Huber <patrikhuber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 14:18:51 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5TWVKSvPSFL0Rs2cxAoYw23lqX2kr+6ixTEFo/8WcQs=; b=XbrdLlvsuNTz7dvjZJqVOU3DYNw53WoUAdiMqS5lCW5LA0ySSnRuE8c5z2WMI7U4pl xnW2Hk8FLDuTgPlhnWzdYbv26urfd3OCPi61on6DiDAQZQ0Cwsb3YZzLPrkguY9iKETS bRhmZXY2eXKO7Jp/s8IMd/PhOVBlyyVrktit/0gadkxSq+citmRAeaZscSTtP6C1U1Kh j3AgGLcs2Vd1JZ9wWQohen9wr7SIcoQ9eZtNwIhgkBliHikgEXIrAQSaCj4Rj1Tc6I1J 0UTV3vHf1TfwxRpq8wbGi0hBzSZTWcxPI1QE7/vPOojaj8ESt1jOdYQ26cHmYd+43JKJ w8tw==
I'm very glad you asked that, I would also be very curious and would love to hear/know more.
Particularly I would be interested in:
* What's the roadmap for switching to using more of C++11/14 by default (or even C++17), deprecating older compilers - even fully move to C++11/14?
* What's the status and plans of the unsupported/Tensor module? I think this is in active use by Google for TensorFlow, is it not? Given that, I am a bit surprised that it is still an "unsupported" module..