[eigen] Parallel .solve(B) for B.cols() > 1 |

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

*To*: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: [eigen] Parallel .solve(B) for B.cols() > 1*From*: Julian Kent <julian.kent@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:23:02 +0100*Dkim-signature*: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pix4d.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DI8Xq3t0il/KzE2o+F0Dm/Qvw+YZA61Hoh3EgNoda5g=; b=VQ5QksrQ0aKqdZzd+zrAkUx2J72/qZr0RlSUbEW38yp71UZO3bC2HxlD/0stv8QYR5 wSBnYOoBB3yBheTRHc1YaoAiIWNThOyxi1Zj1qC6TRZCc9Bm1TF7IIKBdLktt6/dM7Jk wT2gfTI0qvDk48bue7XOfrQ9MYY1eAY9OPWHI=

Hi all

Is there a reason that Eigen doesn't do a parallel x = decomposition.solve(B) by splitting B into column-wise chunks?Thanks

Julian Kent

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [eigen] Parallel .solve(B) for B.cols() > 1***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Messages sorted by:**[ date | thread ]- Prev by Date:
**Re: [eigen] On a flexible API for submatrices, slicing, indexing, masking, etc.** - Next by Date:
**Re: [eigen] On a flexible API for submatrices, slicing, indexing, masking, etc.** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Componentwise Operations on an Arbitrary Number of Tensors** - Next by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Parallel .solve(B) for B.cols() > 1**

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |