Re: [eigen] GeneralizedEigenSolver eigenvalues different from lapack dggev |

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

*To*: "eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Subject*: Re: [eigen] GeneralizedEigenSolver eigenvalues different from lapack dggev*From*: "Wood, Tobias" <tobias.wood@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:39:15 +0000*Accept-language*: en-GB, en-US*Authentication-results*: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tobias.wood@xxxxxxxxx;*Spamdiagnosticmetadata*: NSPM*Spamdiagnosticoutput*: 1:99*Thread-index*: AQHR7lVAA1GdbRK0+kCNX+fXiXDe+aA46fAAgAAJqACAETVWAA==*Thread-topic*: [eigen] GeneralizedEigenSolver eigenvalues different from lapack dggev

Hello Gael, Thanks for looking at the complex eigenvalues. I missed your replies to the bug #645 thread as I had a problem with my other e-mail account in the last couple of weeks. I’ll try to look at the eigenvectors again when I get a chance. Toby On 04/08/2016, 16:51, "Bill Greene" <w.h.greene@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Thanks for the quick reply! With 3.3-beta2, all 9 eigenvalues in my simple test agree between GeneralizedEigenSolver and lapack. For what its worth, the alpha and beta components for the complex conjugate pairs differ from those returned by dggev but, as I say, the quotients are the same. Bill On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I've recently applied some changes in GeneralizedEigenSolver, so it might be worth trying 3.3-beta2. Then, it could also be the case that your pair of matrices is not diagonalizable, in which case both implementation returns garbage. Finally, sharing your matrices would help to identify the issue. gael On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bill Greene <w.h.greene@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I have a simple test case with n=9 where alpha(i) and beta(i) for five eigenvalues agree but four do not. Only one pair of three of the complex conjugate pairs agree. For the two pair that do not agree, the alpha values are very large (i.e. 10^61). I took a look at bug 645 and it is unclear to me if the problem I'm seeing is related to that issue. I'm using Eigen 3.2.9 but could certainly try 3.3-beta if appropriate. Thanks. Bill Greene

**References**:**[eigen] GeneralizedEigenSolver eigenvalues different from lapack dggev***From:*Bill Greene

**Re: [eigen] GeneralizedEigenSolver eigenvalues different from lapack dggev***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Re: [eigen] GeneralizedEigenSolver eigenvalues different from lapack dggev***From:*Bill Greene

**Messages sorted by:**[ date | thread ]- Prev by Date:
**Re: [eigen] Scalar vs. int / double in SelfAdjointEigenSolver.h** - Next by Date:
**[eigen] ceres-solver fails to build with eigen 3.3~beta2** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [eigen] GeneralizedEigenSolver eigenvalues different from lapack dggev** - Next by thread:
**[eigen] CMake not configuring**

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |