Re: [eigen] operator== (and probably others) for 0-sized Eigen-types

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

To: eigen <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eigen] operator== (and probably others) for 0-sized Eigen-types
From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:56:19 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=thygHrksoSm2wGdoR4EtkEvOHtnSmgAvyseszmlK8Q4=; b=ZxnpfO+ja0Ujkr9aRzbnUiGtfv1W14rpG60ahGZmOAunlmaI9Oz5swJeulaS7ezIXI giKtH3Zyd0f2ILoJ81pEKZdVbxM3U4d7M7GtAPDH+EH9G5JLL8tp/4qBQB9Os7rwUv99 9QKyeWz1xsIT+nfqMBWOZ9wFJAlpk60ycJ6V+y9gD5xRP8PQbLS+HbPE+V9DGUQh9DfX Q9+eCV+wpbkDxdaX8imevk1MG906pMnwydEesUI0iQa2MjSbpIRm5CXYE5d9j3cw4ycV gTYsm9CBkIXzMSoKelIc+9n5ba/qBuVSpZjwE1Nb8/B+5heD/VRxjuQSOtrc0fISBLTY lHew==

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Christoph Hertzberg <chtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The fix won't be too complicated, I just did not care enough yet ...
If there are no objections against [].all()==true && [].any()==false, I can implement that this week (unless someone is faster).

I'm ok with that. go ahead!

gael

References:
- [eigen] operator== (and probably others) for 0-sized Eigen-types
  - From: Daniel.Vollmer
- Re: [eigen] operator== (and probably others) for 0-sized Eigen-types
  - From: Gael Guennebaud
- Re: [eigen] operator== (and probably others) for 0-sized Eigen-types
  - From: Christoph Hertzberg

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [eigen] operator== (and probably others) for 0-sized Eigen-types
Next by Date: Re: [eigen] Interesting C++ standard proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [eigen] operator== (and probably others) for 0-sized Eigen-types
Next by thread: Re: [eigen] operator== (and probably others) for 0-sized Eigen-types

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/