| [eigen] Re: Conjugate gradient |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [eigen] Re: Conjugate gradient
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:05:06 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=hkB29FEleRiigwMlnMg3uvuHUZ860F4eGtUeYvbx8Lw=; b=qevWGyDbZVo7jvScYohnAeaxgN/aSwBz9HoMCjtSmqneyPIOkqdMkHa0SVw772fpgi 2LJBORgfXMC6cMugxcrQ9uE/NtOO1w+3YsMqG3YmGPJGk9PGg96FR1uhBxvZ7exN/TaM rZtEKf0DANAOwo3kuz/ZwGZFPTYLfl/NzMg88=
Hi,
to keep you informed, I've recently committed a BiCGSTAB solver with
preconditioning. In the future I'd like to add the possibility to
control the stopping criteria and to allow for step by step solving
without overhead.
gael
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Gael Guennebaud
<gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I also have at hand a BiCGSTAB, a block diagonal preconditioner and an
> incomplete LLT that needs some polishing....