| Re: [eigen] Idea: BLAS backend |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Idea: BLAS backend
- From: Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:18:15 +0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1296739096; bh=l082ufJYgC0AkEslF9vcXNUWhN3KHmUV35iCTD/7ffM=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=gMjk5L2HDyjdQN/ov33PQBLvopaBOIL5+GlQ3h6Zuhu6p/FMVNH+hli6xtX46s90X +y40xRO+T+2mKpewPqfkNAVXUvA9x38k0eqjYf2w/Vi5/payyaAS3u8KA07360wCO+ 9R+msYuo90uoptLhA3IULUeWClmATEKUMgs8uxjc=
> I don't believe at all that code size would be an argument here. Being
> a template library we allow the users to compiler only the code that
> they want. By contrast, a binary library like GotoBLAS contains code
> for all functions, for all 4 numeric types. It can't compete with us
> on code size.
I've implied static linking, of course :)
However I haven't measured actual sizes, it was just a random idea
--
Regards,
Konstantin