| Re: [eigen] No support for complex-symmetric? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] No support for complex-symmetric?
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:22:52 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UThx0p/3dNtF1QBGSsWcuxo/jfh3F3PDGcMqskTnhrI=; b=xZpM2GzKKxP9+JRUmgDV+wUImrc9efVXeo1Cxey2Akap5xzMYrJmMVNMCgX4B7oFYf N48pcFhgTQF2+cex6sLep7LkfbeP9xm8/CsLP0vzAMMhb6sJfy0uBreUJtKkwTTjeKL2 V2wz+oxkJVB0+cviq4MFPkvZYycjN2/tSk9H4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ISn3cF7T0/CUclDrv/GpVDvuqJrz0nblrPM+iwzbAhaY/Hbo3DciKUIkAaqwBBWE0Z P9nZ5xxLeWz4nJ3icYG/2QxRdtDiNB3OBRtrYWjVxJr9P1oTRWT94x5Ff9viEYtnuexc COWXRmOPeYzhCEwaVvV0T0ZDLRVihLYelteao=
Hi,
No; I wasn't ever aware that they came up in real-world problems.
Could be added later if indeed they have a use.
Benoit
2010/6/30 Manoj Rajagopalan <rmanoj@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> Complex-symmetric matrices come up in some PDE problems. I notice
> selfAdjoint as a mode parameter for triangularView in Core/util/Constants..h
> but no symmetric. So complex-symmetric matrices are not currently supported
> by triangular-views?
>
> thanks,
> Manoj
>
>
>