Re: [eigen] An insistent plea for an input operator |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] An insistent plea for an input operator
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:18:26 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iPDlQoZpza01CN+NELU3h2pKfXT889qfRmASdTXpPR4=; b=l2BYk0kmob8BEafX83UJxfpExeughWqqOO9kS+uLzdqXhbrg1DGf6/cfzzg5dO3GoX DDLoV+WUckguOlFPOfvmO7nsn9xM1MnaFoVkzKMPe+XDgYkaP98l/VhHTeVvNMdyK5Lg s6QGUYsAqmJ43SlKJUPe5v5cOVObgxG7tUIps=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fiwFTd3xrzTyGwuEZMI0J0csRvipQLrMtbkvhQJtFQv2L+A/g4CRI6rvyf/f4mmvfU re4jjyMZI4wn8IhdmGQ9H+up4EXtd2cR3zTSYtzsmBjlJRILOxn6TcWR5tUpzTJ3C7Qx tNQnMKI3/lggNUm84qwV4ZSqYKSUMiBsTd7Rs=
2010/7/20 Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2010/7/20 Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 2010/7/20 Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>> Sure! How is this a problem?
>>>>
>>>> Not really but somebody might think hey, it accepts input from
>>>> std::cin in the form of
>>>>
>>>> 1 2 3
>>>> 4 5 6
>>>>
>>>> why not from a text file... I admit, we can easily deal with that. I
>>>> was more like brainstorming. ;)
>>>
>>> Just for the record: I don't see how allowing reading from a text file
>>> is a drawback, I see it as a feature :-)
>>
>> Of course it is! But not if it does not work even though it compiles.
>> I requires a different method.
>>
>> Your other proposal sound fine to me as long as its fine for the user.
>> I was actually hoping for something as the standard library does. You
>> know, there are these modifiers. I don't recall perfectly, but they
>> somehow look like this
>>
>> std::cout << std::ios_base::hex << 10 << std::endl;
>
> The problem is that we can't extend that from the out side with our
> own modifiers: that would require adding new data members in cout...
(ignore the above and read only the below)
>
>>
>> or then with Eigen types like this
>>
>> std::cout << Eigen::Format(...) << m;
>>
>> or this
>>
>> std::cin >> Eigen::Format(...) >> m;
>
> Ah, this looks possible. so here the std::cout << Eigen::Format(...)
> would return a stream of a different type, inheriting the type of the
> original stream.
>
> Benoit
>
>
>>
>> I would like this a lot since it were following the standard approach
>> but the other one is fine too.
>>
>> - Hauke
>>
>>
>>
>