Re: [eigen] Vectorwise dot product feature request

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]


Because .dot() returns a scalar, whereas multiplication returns an 1x1 matrix.

Marton



On 7 July 2010 14:15, Johan Pauwels <johan.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2010-07-07 13:02, Aron Ahmadia wrote:
>
> That looks suspiciously like a transposed multiply to me...
>
> Ugh, exactly. Sorry for the bother. My mind was so set on a collection of
> independent columns and broadcasting operations, that I forgot the basic
> matrix multiplication. One might wonder why there even is a .dot() syntax?
>
> Regards,
> Johan
>
> A
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Johan Pauwels <johan.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Would it be possible to allow a vectorwise dot product as in the example
>> below?
>>
>> #include <Eigen/Core>
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>>    Eigen::MatrixXf mat = Eigen::MatrixXf::Random(5,2);
>>    Eigen::VectorXf vec = Eigen::VectorXf::Random(5);
>>    Eigen::RowVectorXf result(2);
>>
>>    // this syntax
>>    result = mat.colwise().dot(vec);
>>    // instead of this for loop
>>    for (int i = 0; i < mat.cols(); ++i)
>>    {
>>        result[i] = mat.col(i).dot(vec);
>>    }
>> }
>>
>> Regards,
>> Johan
>>
>>
>
>
>



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/