Re: [eigen] CTEST doesn't went through |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] CTEST doesn't went through
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:21:03 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jcPoFQgnSVW62ClO2tBt5M2j6FXfN1jlbg6ynbJcZq4=; b=RDkwNQnqP808hg9opv6KaEzjJ+2xT6O4MSUKCi58D7bWx0Lv+FmwZ0DkPGf1YDZo1B n1bLxWd7lrATS9DkUFJSjmezabT+fsgt1jcVKF1Wg0bVb1rE97IjvIpEcyJEZLggrrdC 9F65J8L9YEecl6ka+T2T1Yhn60f0HELgAmbZ4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=getJ/LiEpvUaeIG9Is4sIui55uKJ8FjR4vgYPKOxCA4pXUg9l02Qx2MBSzUXH1cf+u xskCUDYIXNI47OFzLlmFXyC5TlvpYgdCwI+kzqKGM4tPwgdFJ2xA8D/REhG2DGP+wTpY VspIckdktlmH+0M17nu51uCSJhvOZFFFHXrYs=
wow, sorry, I introduced so many bugs these days. I hope this time
they are all gone.
gael
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Hauke Heibel
<hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Almost everything. I know it is currently located in unsupported but the
>
> sparse_llt_1
> sparse_llt_2
>
> tests are still looping forever. The first bad commit is this one:
>
> The first bad revision is:
> changeset: 3027:c93abfa8ffcb
> parent: 3023:c3b8e6edde53
> user: Gael Guennebaud <g.gael@xxxxxxx>
> date: Wed Jun 23 16:34:51 2010 +0200
> summary: fix cache queries for non core2 CPU ;)
>
> - Hauke
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Gael Guennebaud
> <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> pb solved
>>
>> gael
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Gael Guennebaud
>> <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I found the issue, I'm fixing it....
>>>
>>> gael
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Hauke Heibel
>>> <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Happens since this revision (first bad one):
>>>>
>>>> The first bad revision is:
>>>> changeset: 3021:d6b1276a9728
>>>> parent: 3019:87984ebf854e
>>>> user: Gael Guennebaud <g.gael@xxxxxxx>
>>>> date: Tue Jun 22 16:08:35 2010 +0200
>>>> summary: * makes all product use the new API to set the blocking sizes
>>>>
>>>> I'll try to look into it later.
>>>>
>>>> - Hauke
>
>
>