Re: [eigen] Missing operator definition in Sparse? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Missing operator definition in Sparse?
- From: Sameer Agarwal <sameeragarwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:14:08 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1277475250; bh=mupzF0hq1JoF7y2jB0Qxexn6kCc=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CUOpAv6KNfTLtFDB88/L0EOUxGyHdatFHWAV2yK9F0wG3n3ZaDVL3rgsAXJLrBseT tqiCK8qdzipsO0WCjCnRA==
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=uz7vyJGNoGHce6wzqvVzJHKBX4DPf3QwiBZDLHj7IOXLoAeaRM5IU9qXBxY+A8lkN vSIrr63IcN0KBzpIgoqjQ==
Thank you.
Sameer
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Gael Guennebaud
<gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> implemented and committed as a standard sparse expression.
>
> cheers,
>
> gael
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Sameer Agarwal
> <sameeragarwal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Gael,
>>
>> x*y^T where one of the vectors is dense and one is sparse should
>> return a sparse matrix.
>> m.col(0) is a large but extremely sparse vector, so creating a dense
>> temporary is a bad idea.
>> Such rank 1 updates are not that uncommon. I encounter this one
>> while constructing a preconditioner.
>>
>> I can solve the problem by making both the vectors sparse, but I would
>> argue that the mixed version should also work.
>>
>> Sameer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Gael Guennebaud
>> <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Sameer Agarwal
>>> <sameeragarwal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>
>>>> I am using the development branch. The following bit of code does not compile.
>>>>
>>>> #include "Eigen/Core"
>>>> #include "Eigen/Sparse"
>>>>
>>>> typedef Eigen::SparseMatrix<double, Eigen::ColMajor> SparseCol;
>>>> typedef Eigen::Matrix<double, Eigen::Dynamic, 1> Vector;
>>>>
>>>> int main() {
>>>> int nrow = 5;
>>>> int ncol = 5;
>>>> SparseCol m(nrow,ncol);
>>>> Vector x(ncol,1);
>>>> SparseCol A = m.subcols(1, 4) - m.col(0)* x.transpose();
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Compiled complains about a missing operator definition.
>>>
>>> Indeed, there is no special handling for m.col(0)* x.transpose(). It
>>> is treated as a standard sparse by dense product, and so it returns a
>>> dense object...
>>>
>>> To be honest I'm a bit surprised by such an expression, but if you
>>> need it that's easily doable.
>>>
>>> As a side note, the following works but fully evaluate the outer
>>> product to a dense temporary matrix:
>>>
>>> Vector x(4,1);
>>> SparseCol A = m.subcols(1, 4) - (m.col(0)* x.transpose()).sparseView();
>>>
>>> (you need to update your local copy to make it compile fine)
>>>
>>> gael
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> test_sparse.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
>>>> test_sparse.cc:12: error: no match for ‘operator-’ in
>>>> ‘m.Eigen::SparseMatrix<double, 0,
>>>> int>::<anonymous>.Eigen::SparseMatrixBase<Derived>::subcols [with
>>>> Derived = Eigen::SparseMatrix<double, 0, int>](1, 4) -
>>>> Eigen::SparseMatrixBase<Derived>::operator*(const
>>>> Eigen::MatrixBase<OtherDerived>&) const [with OtherDerived =
>>>> Eigen::Transpose<Eigen::Matrix<double, -0x00000000000000001, 1, 0,
>>>> -0x00000000000000001, 1> >, Derived =
>>>> Eigen::SparseInnerVectorSet<Eigen::SparseMatrix<double, 0, int>,
>>>> 1>](((const Eigen::MatrixBase<Eigen::Transpose<Eigen::Matrix<double,
>>>> -0x00000000000000001, 1, 0, -0x00000000000000001, 1> > >&)((const
>>>> Eigen::MatrixBase<Eigen::Transpose<Eigen::Matrix<double,
>>>> -0x00000000000000001, 1, 0, -0x00000000000000001, 1> >
>>>>>*)(&((Eigen::DenseBase<Eigen::Matrix<double, -0x00000000000000001, 1,
>>>> 0, -0x00000000000000001, 1> >*)(&
>>>> x))->Eigen::DenseBase<Derived>::transpose [with Derived =
>>>> Eigen::Matrix<double, -0x00000000000000001, 1, 0,
>>>> -0x00000000000000001, 1>]()))))’
>>>> Eigen/src/Sparse/../plugins/CommonCwiseUnaryOps.h:59: note: candidates
>>>> are: const Eigen::CwiseUnaryOp<Eigen::ei_scalar_opposite_op<typename
>>>> Eigen::ei_traits<Derived>::Scalar>, Derived>
>>>> Eigen::SparseMatrixBase<Derived>::operator-() const [with Derived =
>>>> Eigen::SparseInnerVectorSet<Eigen::SparseMatrix<double, 0, int>,
>>>> -0x00000000000000001>]
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sameer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>