| Re: [eigen] Blocked QR decomposition ? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Blocked QR decomposition ?
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:27:31 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vDMVphOPEsbkkvad+COzbv8gTc8rz7fVhephvpHcKYI=; b=r0PcsiLlE05CzEtw67LePnOmD4uMlLNsyJ08vzRx1xROQnjV5lmPefo3jw+U5ihjAG Z+LzLNF0Mv/oYCB/CgrCjrTceW/GdJndPfaKBFCl4TBL3LxJG4OsxHrjC5AoBB+Lds5u jtRGohdniazKa/eJOlAVYcDCyJa9Co3JrxV48=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kadW1Q8EKbAka2kBhn0fL0QSFafpAx7RbR8ZrvB4iKaw8UmHnicg909RQavFyoUWpU 6wiTXhzQW41Upy/KWMYYkPyd/9E4yOvAnpnM4v4Pvf+KP3FEjJTVLTfAfYhbc3TEzoeP A1hRj2udyUFF9yizVpFDVg0DTIx6g/aEalwpY=
Yes, it's planned, it's definitely wanted. More generally what we want
is an implementation of blocked householder transformations, so that
all our hoursholder-based decompositions can benefit.
Fortunately our framework makes this an implementation detail so if
this doesn't make it into 3.0 it'll be possible to transparently add
this to some 3.x release.
Benoit
2010/5/19 <vincent.lejeune@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm starting to work on QR (Householder algorithm) decomposition...But I
>
> find no blocked implementation in Eigen for this algorithm, even in dev
>
> branch.
>
> Is it planned for a future release or not at all ?
>
>
>