Re: [eigen] Indexes: why signed instead of unsigned?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

2010/5/11 Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 11 May 2010 16:47, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I just had a diabolic idea, if we agree that bigger-than-2^31-support
>> is not a top priority and will at most be used by relatively few
>> people, then we can keep things unchanged for now, so keep 'int' in
>> Eigen 3.0, and later on, when actual people actually need it (perhaps
>> in eigen 3.45), add a non-default compile-time option
>> EIGEN_USE_LONG_INDICES. Such an option would then break the ABI of
>> Eigen classes, so it couldn't become default.
>> Question - is BLAS/LAPACK using int or ptrdiff_t ?
>> Benoit
> As this move will break the ABI then why not implement it right on the
> 3.0 release instead of pushing it to a point release in the future?

Because we've a lot on our plates already now.


> Rui Maciel

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+