| Re: [eigen] Re: 2.0.11 on January 10 ? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Re: 2.0.11 on January 10 ?
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:24:50 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cJxgef+/3jw+RsPhEaDEWgpuvJ9fCkO1j8M+pso9uGw=; b=Xk95HYByR1dp+DLk33/MAbR9gbhGZjJk9+oBbFcL5qPWbCESuR2oEvUYOFIyOsC1oF 1AG+WIbAlRio/mx8boytTxLJId9S1ijuddj4kpsY5N5cYiHfGkAZjM+nzbyvlgtkdc6G RwPaGUcpDJEuzRQpyOIUvOWtF5gwyW/39h44g=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MmXybz8WU/nIEjJIXryEXjkW+/1hsxEjttVA96tw0bvNNj/j0Cmfap/i4T0keWOgth fnHtwoYdaykvUorG5hYxIk8K4FxzVx2YxOcgI0VJhRumg0nOsyiMxjgSqvGVGRcSA4up 8YhQFDsD/anGadVa23fuCtg4XXdBKe2iL8vDc=
gcc 3.3 works fine.
gael
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a reminders: you only have 4 days to introduce a regression in 2.0.11.
> I'd be very interested to hear about horrible breakage with GCC 3.3 especially.
>
> Benoit
>
> 2009/12/29 Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Happy holidays!
>> What do you think of the title?
>> Quite some good stuff has accumulated in the 2.0 branch!
>> Testing is welcome, especially if your application does a lot of 4x4
>> matrix inversion, or quaternion SLERP, or if you use MSVC 2010.
>> I would also like to hear about successful reports of building the
>> unit tests with GCC 3.3. Just for reminders, building the Eigen 2.0
>> unit tests goes as follows:
>> cmake -DEIGEN_BUILD_TESTS=ON /path/to/eigen2.0
>> make
>>
>> Benoit
>>
>
>
>