| Re: [eigen] Quaternion and expression template |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
But coming back to my previous proposal. Why should we implement a
destructor when there is nothing to do. I agree, that in some cases it
might be required but then we could do that in those cases. The thing is
that there is one case left which we ignored. Destrcutors can be trivial
(required for objects you want to put in unions,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1025313/c-will-an-empty-destructor-do-the-same-thing-as-the-generated-destructor)
and it is not possible to declare a destructor as such when it is
explicitly implemented.
So since tagging with throw() does not help we should get rid of the
Matrix destructor as well es the remaining (some specializations already
have none) ei_matrix_storage destructors (when possible).
Yes, it's better than the current situation.
--
Mathieu